FiftyFive.One

• Voices From Soccer's North •

  • Heath’s Rejected Molino Bid in the Age of Transparency

    Wes Burdine

    January 20, 2017
    News

    When reporting on Minnesota United’s offer to Orlando City for Kevin Molino last week, FourFourTwo’s Paul Tenorio threw in an interesting figure: $500,000. In light of MLS’ new-found transparency, this number tells us that the interest from Minnesota was significant since it would have been the second-highest intraleague transfer as far as the public record is concerned.

    At the end of Minnesota United’s media day on Thursday, Adrian Heath acted his regular gregarious self, joking with reporters. When asked about his pursuit of his former charge, Orlando City’s Kevin Molino, he started answering, “I normally get myself in trouble whenever I mention Orlando…” and then stopped himself, exasperated, “In fact, don’t mention anything.”

    Whether or not the pursuit is over, the interest in Molino seems to have been significant. In the past, whenever mention of allocation money involved in a trade came out, it was nearly impossible to contextualize, because MLS clubs have been so secretive. However, in the new era of partial transparency, MLS has begun announcing the amounts of GAM and TAM involved in trades.

    This week began with Dax McCarty’s $400,000 (GAM) trade to the Chicago Fire, and while the trade itself was interesting, the number attached to it raised the most eyebrows. Sam Stejskal puts this into perspective:

    According to numbers that I’ve been able to track down from various executives at several MLS clubs (the amount of allocation money exchanged in trades only began being publicly released at the SuperDraft last Friday), the $400,000 in GAM sent by Chicago to New York is the second largest amount of GAM exchanged in MLS history, trailing only the deal that sent Eddie Johnson from Seattle to D.C. in 2013, which sources tell me saw the Sounders net in the neighborhood of $650,000 in GAM.

    A $500,000 bid for Kevin Molino, then, represents a significant level of interest from Minnesota United. According to Stejskal, it would have been the second largest intraleague transfer.

    Molino would have also bolstered an attack that currently lacks a dedicated right-wing presence.

    “We’ve got some holes to fill.”

    Looking over his squad, Heath admits, “We’ve got some holes to fill.” But having only 16 players heading into the weekend before preseason doesn’t bother the manager.

    Heath wants 23 to 24 players by March and in the meanwhile, the team will be taking its time to make sure it signs the right players, rather than rushing decisions. “I think the most important thing is to get the right ones. We probably rushed in Orlando and took one or two players too early and we regretted it.”

    More players are in the works, Heath says. He did not mention any names, but as we have previously reported the signing of Rasmus Schüller is being pursued. In addition, several Loons are likely to make a return. Ibson has told several news outlets that he will be back in Minnesota and Brent Kallman looks very likely to continue on with the club as well. Others may yet return, but at this stage it’s too early to say. Paul Tenorio has also linked the club to former Portland Timber defender Jermaine Taylor.

    Heath also returned to his hint before the draft that there was a “huge signing” in the works and said that the club is “a lot closer than we were a week ago… I’m confident we’ll get the one we’re after.” Asked if this was a “huge name” or a “huge signing,” Heath was enigmatic: “depends on what you call a huge name.”

    The Loons also need two goalkeepers and Heath said, “We are actively looking at [the goalkeeper] situation.”

    Minnesota United begins their preseason on Monday in Arizona.

    Adrian Heath, Kevin Molino, Minnesota United FC, MLS, Orlando City SC
    Next
    Previous

    10 responses to “Heath’s Rejected Molino Bid in the Age of Transparency”

    1. John Herman Avatar
      John Herman
      January 20, 2017

      Bummer that Molino didn’t work out. I think getting the right pieces now is probably worth paying a premium, especially when we’ve still got the cash lying around. Hopefully we’re his next club regardless–sounds like he’s not thrilled at Orlando, and he’s sort of birds of a feather with Rambarra.

      Didn’t see Jermaine Taylor coming but I like it. There’s more than enough versatility back there to have a 3 man rotation at CB. Calvo can hop to LB occasionally, or Demidov can spot start at the 6. Or would Demidov become the presumptive starting 6? Or is Taylor aging into a backup role? Strikes me a solid addition either way if it happens–you add starter-quality depth at 3 positions thanks to that versatility.

      Still curious about the huge signing. Doesn’t sound like it’ll be a truly “huge name” but I’m cool with that, and Heath seems confident that it’ll go through.

      Reply
    2. Blake Johnson Avatar
      Blake Johnson
      January 20, 2017

      Any inclination as to what position this “big signing” will be?

      Reply
      1. Wes Avatar
        Wes
        January 23, 2017

        If you asked a week ago I would have said a TAM-level striker, but I don’t think that’s the case. Not really sure at this point

        Reply
        1. Really?!?!? Avatar
          Really?!?!?
          January 23, 2017

          I’m hoping a TAM-level winger or AM (to go with Venegas & Ibarra starting), but a proven high-level striker would be welcomed as well…

          Reply
    3. Really?!?!? Avatar
      Really?!?!?
      January 23, 2017

      I have questions about Jermaine Taylor, if he is considered for a starting role, and the defense in general. He is a valuable sub and spot starter, but if counted on as a starter from day 1, Minnesota is in trouble IMO. But don’t get me wrong – I’d love him as a depth player right now.

      There needs to be a star-level CB (or DM if Demidov is considered a lock for CB from the start). There are OK / possibly MLS-Average defensive pieces between defense and central midfield (Saeid, Warner in M; Calvo, Greenspan, Kallman in D, and Demidov in whichever position he plays; Ibson to me is more of a #10 or higher up #8). However, depth & the abilities of depth players would be extremely tested, a lot of the players are inexperienced in MLS (so who even knows if they’ll do well enough in MLS), only a couple have strong resumes so far, and i don’t see many with really high ceilings. Warner & Saeid have at least proven themselves to be solid MLS squad players, Calvo may have a lot of promise, and Demidov at least has an OK resume. Bring in a TAM-level player or close – anything from a Chara, Olonzo, or Laba (to maybe even a Juninho, Tchani, or Cronin) in mid, or a Ciman, Van Damme, or Birnbaum (to maybe even a Hedges, Sjoberg, or Moor) in D – and I’d feel better.

      I just feel this roster overall is so completely untested at the MLS level, and has a lot of average players compared to other teams in MLS, and possibly no all-star-level players – even while I am hopeful. The most promising player right now (highest ceiling in the near term) IMO is Johan Venegas and he didn’t even get much playing time on Montreal, along with Ibarra (who didn’t play much in Mexico) & Ramirez (highest level being NASL) right behind. I’m hopeful at least that all 3 can elevate their games. Danladi may have the highest ceiling long term. But we’ll see….

      Go Loons.

      Reply
      1. Really?!?!? Avatar
        Really?!?!?
        January 23, 2017

        BTW, IMO Molino would have had the same effect on the front 4, as I think he would have been somewhat better than everyone else (Venegas, Ibarra, Ramirez, Danladi, Ibson, etc) right now, and has played close to MLS all-star level this past year+….

        Reply
      2. Really?!?!? Avatar
        Really?!?!?
        January 23, 2017

        Oh, and can a starting GK be acquired please?!?!? lol

        Reply
      3. John Herman Avatar
        John Herman
        January 24, 2017

        Yeah, I guess we’ll find out soon enough who’s going to pan out. One encouraging point is that with most prior expansion teams, a few guys really thrive in the new setting, Le Toux being the prime example. I’m guessing because the system maximizes some of its core acquisitions, and some guys thrive with a fresh start.

        I agree that J-Ven seems most likely to make the leap, but I’m bullish on Ibarra and Ramirez doing Molino-esque things as well. Abu is well situated to thrive, and Heath has been kinda hyperbolic talking about him. Hopefully Heath can reproduce his accomplishments with the Orlando front line. I think he’ll be close and I think our offense will surprise people, although I’m still hoping for that TAM right winger.

        As for the back line, people that know better than me are really high on Calvo. And Demidov’s track record for the last two years reads like an expansion team’s fan fiction. Barring injury, I think both guys can be top-tier defenders, though I’m not enough of a homer to peg them as all stars. Add in Taylor or someone like him, and you unlock their versatility, and the depth picture looks a lot better.

        I agree that our star power is questionable right now, but I also think it’ll deliver because a number of guys have the potential to step up. Especially if the ‘huge signing’ happens.

        As for the average or hopefully-average guys: yeah. I mean, you’re not going to be above average at every position unless Garrison Kieller is the coach, but I wish that our average-ceiling guys weren’t penciled in at the middle of the spine. It helps if Schuller signs and delivers the goods, but even then we might get outclassed in the middle some weeks.

        As for the fullbacks? Yeah. Kind of a high-risk, low reward situation right now.

        Reply
        1. Really?!?!? Avatar
          Really?!?!?
          January 25, 2017

          I agree with a lot of that analysis (though stress that I don’t think Taylor is very good), especially at outside back (risk/reward, and lack of depth right now). And I’m hopeful as well. There is potential, but it is just that it is a LOT of places with so much of that potential….too many spots for my comfort (which TBF is logical with an expansion team). Schuller, Calvo, & Demidov all have potential to be really excellent MLS signings, but foreign players have always been hit or mis in terms of adapting to MLS. I too am very hopefully for Ibarra, Ramirez, and Venegas as I stated, but they have a lot to prove after their past years (not much playing time in MX, stepping up from NASL, not a lot of playing time in MTL), so it’s just potential, potential, potential. And yeah, if a “huge” signing happens at the #10 especially or a forward opposite / in conjunction with Ramirez, then I’ll feel pretty good.

          Reply
          1. John Herman Avatar
            John Herman
            January 26, 2017

            For sure. Thinking about it, this is a uniquely exciting time to be a fan. Every team has a few new additions to salivate over, but we’ve got a roster full of them! Plus plenty of reason for optimism. That’s my pitch at least, but it all centers around Heath.

            Heath has emphasized bringing in guys who want to be here, hopefully that has weeded out a few duds. He has also had more say in roster decisions than he did in Orlando, so worries about fit are smaller. I also think he can at least replicate a lot of his Orlando success in player development, at least on offense, and perhaps avoid some easy expansion team mistakes.

            There’s plenty of reason for optimism, anyway. And with so much up in the air, optimism carries a long way. We’ll find out soon enough how justified it is.

            Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Subscribe Now

Recent Posts

  • Miguel Ibarra’s My Friend: The end of an era in Minnesota
  • Photo Gallery: Minnesota United FC Loses First-Ever Playoff Match
  • Matchdays Twenty-Nine Through Thirty-Four: Playoff Spotlight
  • Photo Gallery: MNUFC Draws LAFC In Final Home Match
  • MINvLAFC Open Game Thead

Copyright © 2023 FiftyFive.One

Design by ThemesDNA.com